From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Zarochentsev Subject: Re: Repacker cause fs corruption: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:11:20 +0400 Message-ID: <20040914101120.GF2252@backtop.namesys.com> References: <710218328.20040914105908@tnonline.net> <20040914094223.GE2252@backtop.namesys.com> <981213141.20040914120831@tnonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <981213141.20040914120831@tnonline.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Spam Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:08:31PM +0200, Spam wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:59:08AM +0200, Spam wrote: > >> > >> I tried the resier4 repacker yesterday on a 2GB device that I use > >> for /usr/portage in Gentoo. This morning I found these errors in the > >> kernel log: > > > Thanks for the report. > > > How did you start the repacker? which direction did you run it in? > > The direction is "0". I started by issuing: > echo 1 >/sys/fs/reiser4/loop0/repacker/start It looks like the repacker triggers a bug in reiser4. the forward run does not modify reiser4 nodes by itself. > ~S > > >> > >> ########################################################## > >> > >> Repacker: I am alive, pid = 32717 > >> reiser4[k_reiser4_repac(32717)]: renew_sibling_link > >> (fs/reiser4/tree_walk.c:441)[nikita-3532]: > >> WARNING: Sibling nodes on the different levels: 1 != 1 > >> reiser4 repacker: 659 formatted node(s) processed, 170984 > >> unformatted node(s) processed, ret = -5 > -- Alex.