From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Drage <nickd@metastasis.org.uk>
Subject: Re: vpn
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:07:35 +0100
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <20040914160735.GP26823@metastasis.org.uk>
References: <012a01c49a61$340e8ad0$49caa8c0@caris.priv>
	<1095172947.2055.33.camel@localhost>
Reply-To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1095172947.2055.33.camel@localhost>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:42:27AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 09:46, Peter Marshall wrote:

<snip>

> I would suggest an IPSec VPN using either the native IPSec stack in the
> latest Linux or either StrongSWAN (www.strongswan.org) or OpenSWAN
> (www.openswan.org) and placing access control and VPN on the same
> device.  That is how we design most devices for use in the ISCS project
> (http://iscs.sourceforge.net).

Reading "Network Security Hacks" recently I liked the look of VTun.  Any
thoughts on that?  How does it interface with IPTables?

-- 
mors omnia vincit