All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen <bfg-kernel@blenning.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc/config reducing kernel image size
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:26:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040914172646.GA614@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095179606.11939.22.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no>

    Hi Tom :)

 * Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen <bfg-kernel@blenning.no> dixit:
> There is no point in storing all the comments and unused options in the
> kernel image. This typically reduces the config size to about 1/5th
> before compressing, and to about 1/4th after compressing.

    I'm with you in that there is no point in storing the comments,
but I disagree about the unused options. Storing the unused options
as comments is more useful than it seems ;)

    Look at this example. You want to know if you have 'CONFIG_PNP'
enabled, so you do something like 'grep CONFIG_PMP /proc/config' (the
typo PNP->PMP is intended here). Of course that commands doesn't
print anything due to the typo. If you store the disabled options as
comments and a grep fails, you probably mispelled the config option,
or you're referring to a config option not present in your old
kernel, but if you remove them and you mispell the config option
there is no (automatic) way of knowing if you made a typo or if the
option is disabled. Any automatic search can, potentially, give you a
false negative.

    I'm not really sure about it, but I think that the unset options
are left as comments for the sake of automation. The space saving
doesn't (IMHO) worth the pain.

> I've also added the configuration option of how you want to compress it.

    Compression is always welcome, I suppose ;) Thanks for the idea.

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-14 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-14 16:33 /proc/config reducing kernel image size Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen
2004-09-14 17:26 ` DervishD [this message]
2004-09-14 17:36   ` Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen
2004-09-14 18:01     ` DervishD
2004-09-15 10:11       ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-14 17:44 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-09-14 17:57   ` Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen
2004-09-14 18:11     ` Norberto Bensa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040914172646.GA614@DervishD \
    --to=lkml@dervishd.net \
    --cc=bfg-kernel@blenning.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.