From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269458AbUINWZE (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:25:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269226AbUINWZB (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:25:01 -0400 Received: from vapor.arctrix.com ([66.220.1.99]:29453 "HELO vapor.arctrix.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S269623AbUINWVz (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:21:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:21:54 -0400 From: Neil Schemenauer To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Possible dcache BUG: debugging patch Message-ID: <20040914222154.GA18434@mems-exchange.org> References: <20040914211301.GA18197@mems-exchange.org> <20040914200603.GL30422@logos.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040914200603.GL30422@logos.cnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 05:06:03PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > And your trace doesnt seem to look similar to his (different location inside > prune_dcache from what I remember). > > Anyway, how hard is for you to reproduce this? It's only happened once so far. I'll upgrade to 2.6.8.1 and apply your BUG patch on top. If it happens again then maybe we will get more info. Neil