From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sami Samhuri Subject: Re: Reiser4 support on parted program ... Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:42:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20040915154205.GE18622@no-eff-eks.com> References: <41472F46.4000109@futuretg.com> <41477625.304@slaphack.com> <4147E95B.8090108@futuretg.com> <20040915094952.GA5137@backtop.namesys.com> <414840FC.4090505@clusterfs.com> <20040915132013.GG26192@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040915132013.GG26192@nysv.org> List-Id: To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * On Wed Sep-15-2004 at 04:20:13 PM +0300, Markus T?rnqvist said: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:17:48PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote: [resize support for reiser4] > >The only problem Hans seems does not want such a support or does not=20 > >count it as somethinf serious attention should be paid to :( >=20 > I think his followers would disagree ;) This is certainly true. The FS is stable enough for my use, but I won't use it for anything except temporary partitions (/tmp /var/tmp /usr/portage) because if I need to resize I have to recreate. It makes LVM so pointless. I have also seen people mention that the lack of resizing capabilities is a major roadblock for them to adopt reiser4. I can completely understand working out bugs first; however, apart from that I believe it should be given quite high priority. --=20 Sami Samhuri --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBSGLNukGyBH1UC2MRAgAJAJ46b5E8Bbg1aKAbC179Gx6gAvQWrQCggA2P RREbsUHM3Voa/PafCLE/GMg= =v0lJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87--