From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: get_current is __pure__, maybe __const__ even
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:59:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040916035952.GK9106@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095306363.3874.101.camel@cube>
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 22:36, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Not over a call to schedule(). In the midst of schedule().
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 11:49:38PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> OK, let's look.
> First, there's fork/vfork/clone. At no point does
> "current" change. A process comes into existance
> with a ready-made current.
> Second, there's sched.c with context_switch().
> That does everything via switch_to, like so:
> /* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */
> switch_to(prev, next, prev);
> No problem. Now I only need to show that switch_to()
> is safe. Unfortunately, it's arch-specific code.
> I'll look at a few examples...
gcc has to compile more than Linux. There has to be a rule for how this
works, not "gee, Linux will still work and get faster if we change this".
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-16 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-15 22:50 get_current is __pure__, maybe __const__ even Albert Cahalan
2004-09-15 23:15 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-09-15 23:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-16 2:10 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-16 2:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-16 2:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-16 3:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-16 3:49 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-16 3:59 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-16 9:04 ` Russell King
2004-09-16 9:11 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-16 9:30 ` Russell King
2004-09-16 11:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-16 14:36 ` Russell King
2004-09-15 23:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
[not found] <2ER4z-46B-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-16 6:58 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-16 13:43 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-16 14:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-16 19:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040916035952.GK9106@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.