From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: per-cpu table information Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:47:48 -0700 Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040916124748.2138bed4.davem@davemloft.net> References: <41402D9E.5050906@rediffmail.com> <20040915223602.GF2678@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20040915154738.7cb24983.davem@davemloft.net> <20040916071202.GH2678@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, swapsn@rediffmail.com Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20040916071202.GH2678@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:12:02 +0200 Harald Welte wrote: > Anyway, pkttables will simply have a 'matchinfo/targinfo read only' > policy (everybody who needs a writable memory needs to dynamically > allocate and do his own locking), and not have per-rule countes anymore. > This means the whole ruleset is read-only and we don't need any code > replication. Sounds great.