From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8KCEgrT016866 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:14:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from open.hands.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8KCDioq017528 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:13:44 GMT Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:25:48 +0100 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: Russell Coker Cc: Joshua Brindle , selinux , "pebe @lkcl.net>> Chris PeBenito" Subject: Re: [RFC] Upstream policy handling Message-ID: <20040920122548.GM23901@lkcl.net> References: <414DA0A7.1000708@gentoo.org> <200409200646.51865.russell@coker.com.au> <414DF5F2.9030700@gentoo.org> <200409200729.50087.russell@coker.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200409200729.50087.russell@coker.com.au> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:29:50AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > The Debian goals are closer to Gentoo goals than that of Fedora. For example > there is no targeted policy in Debian. *lol* - there _is_ no policy for debian - no group has taken clear responsibility for it "official" like and said "this is it, this is what debian can run with" and i don't believe that is likely to happen. perhaps there _should_ be a targetted debian policy, it would perhaps make how-to-say selinux more acceptable for most debian users? l. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.