From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFTesters] Re: [PATCH] refactor tmscsim inititalization code
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:24:50 +0200
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040920152450.GA27419@lst.de>
References: <20040904130235.GA20552@lst.de> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409071040120.2966@poirot.grange> <20040910133254.GB32530@lst.de> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409172052230.31193@poirot.grange>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:16334 "EHLO mail.lst.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266680AbUITPYv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:24:51 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409172052230.31193@poirot.grange>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

> Ok, now, that the patch has been applied, and, as Christoph informed me, 
> it would be difficult (impossible?) to undo it, we have to fix it. I'll 
> explain my doubts separately as a reply to another Christoph's email. Or 
> would it still be possible to get a patch in, reverting the EEPROM rework?

might be best to just revert it, I'll cook up a patch.