From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mads Martin Joergensen Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:00:23 +0000 Subject: Re: feature requests Message-Id: <20040920210023.GX76919@mmj.dk> List-Id: References: <20040920191944.GA5112@cirrus.madduck.net> In-Reply-To: <20040920191944.GA5112@cirrus.madduck.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org * martin f krafft [Sep 20. 2004 22:59]: > also sprach Mads Martin Joergensen [2004.09.20.2254 +0200]: > > No, it's not not necessary. It's a bug--allthough quite harmless. > > It'll be fixed in next version--we already use Delivered-To: for > > sanity checks, so might as well use it exclusively if present. > > Right. Please consider that Delivered-To is non-standard. Postfix > and qmail do it. exim and sendmail don't, I think. Yeah, if it's there it's used, if not fallback to To: is done. It's a shame it didn't make it into the standards. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.