From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:11:23 +0000 Subject: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 17/17] media/zr36120: Message-Id: <20040920221123.GY2270@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============24937134853723153==" List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============24937134853723153== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:07:07PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Any comments would be appreciated. > > Description: Use ssleep() instead of schedule_timeout() > to guarantee the task delays as expected. Sorry, clearly the patch uses msleep() not ssleep() [Subject line is correct]. -Nish --===============24937134853723153== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============24937134853723153==--