From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:57:47 +0000 Subject: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 1/4] mtd/amd_flash: replace Message-Id: <20040920235747.GD2270@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============43006686101788238==" List-Id: References: <20040920221217.GZ2270@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20040920221217.GZ2270@us.ibm.com> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============43006686101788238== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Any comments would be appreciated. Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan --- 2.6.9-rc2-vanilla/drivers/mtd/chips/amd_flash.c 2004-09-13 17:16:04.000000000 -0700 +++ 2.6.9-rc2/drivers/mtd/chips/amd_flash.c 2004-09-15 09:30:31.000000000 -0700 @@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ retry: timeo = jiffies + (HZ * 20); spin_unlock_bh(chip->mutex); - schedule_timeout(HZ); + msleep(1000); spin_lock_bh(chip->mutex); while (flash_is_busy(map, adr, private->interleave)) { --===============43006686101788238== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============43006686101788238==--