From: Ben Dooks <ben-mtd@fluff.org>
To: "lp4u@inwind.it" <lp4u@inwind.it>
Cc: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, gavin@simtec.co.uk
Subject: Re: NAND detect
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040922202907.GA25491@home.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <I4G9K8$32150B19D33A6F23F04032D520B4890A@libero.it>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 05:55:20PM +0200, lp4u@inwind.it wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a s3c2410 board (BAST architecture).
> I have installed on board a kernel2.4.26 patched and with MTD.
> But the board, at boot, don't detect the NAND (I've 3 NANDs on board: 2 samsung & 1 STM).
Does the bootloader list them, newish versions of the bootloader
should probe all available devices and print the ID information
it finds as it goes.
> The MTD detect only NOR Flash.
I've just had a check through, and it seems the driver was
written pre the nand hooks for >1 chip per controller, and
therefore just selects slot 0 (smartmedia card) at start time.
A quick way to get going would be to change the value passed
to bast_nand_select_slot() in bast_nand_init() in the driver
to at least show that a chip can be detected and used. The
current default in the driver is to select the SmartMedia socket.
The slots are allocated as 0 for the SmartMedia card slot, and
1 through 3 for the chips on the board (U52, U53 and U54)
Looking through the NAND code, it seems that we may have a
few problems with implementing >1 chip, which could bite
in your configuration:
1) The driver needs to work out which slots are used and
create a linear mapping of chips -> slots.
2) The NAND layer itself seems to concatenate the chips
together, not export them as seperate devices, which
makes supporting removable devices in the card slot
and on-board NAND difficult.
I would be interesting in anyone's comments about how difficult
it would be to have an overall controller activity lock and
allow a single controller to register more than one NAND chip
as a seperate device.
It would also be nice to have at least some form of hotplug
mechanism support where a chip can be re-scanned after a
change in it's detect status.
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-22 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 15:55 NAND detect lp4u
2004-09-22 20:29 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2004-09-23 7:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-09-23 9:48 ` Ben Dooks
[not found] ` <20040923191506.GE25491@home.fluff.org>
2004-09-23 23:05 ` Ben Dooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-23 9:54 lp4u
2004-09-23 10:53 ` Ben Dooks
2004-09-28 10:17 Nand detect lp4u
2004-09-28 10:55 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040922202907.GA25491@home.fluff.org \
--to=ben-mtd@fluff.org \
--cc=ben@fluff.org.uk \
--cc=gavin@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lp4u@inwind.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.