From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:59:24 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: drbd-dev@linbit.com, linux-ha-dev@lists.linux-ha.org Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] (CRM and) DRBD (0.8) states and transistions, recovery strategies Message-ID: <20040925095924.GE4267@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20040924211133.GC3927@marowsky-bree.de> <20040925085428.GA4267@marowsky-bree.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: List-Id: Coordination of development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2004-09-25T11:50:04, Lars Ellenberg said: > well. they are different events, and I must handle both of them. > there indeed is no benefit to it. but this is not about theoretically > descibing it, in the end I want to code a state machine from it, > and know that it is complete. Ah. Ok. Then we agree. > appart from the fact that the local storage should never fail, > and should possibly be some sort of raid itself... Right! It'd all be best if nothing ever failed! ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company