All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Overmeer <Mark@Overmeer.net>
To: Stas Nikiforov <stas@itam.nsc.ru>
Cc: Linux-scsi list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	rocks_list <npaci-rocks-discussion@sdsc.edu>
Subject: Re: Huge 1.2TB partition
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:01:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040925100108.A7908@speeltuin.ATComputing.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096019417.2726.61.camel@whirl.lab7.lan>; from stas@itam.nsc.ru on Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:50:17PM +0700

* Stas Nikiforov (stas@itam.nsc.ru) [040924 11:50]:
> I have RAID 5 6x250 SATA storage.
> Is it a good idea to have one huge partition
> or it is better to split it on smaller logical drives and then use LVM,
> for example?
> 
> In any way, what is a preferred filesystem for this storage?
> I plan to use it as a mass storage for CFD results.

I run a disk-set of 4x250 SATA with an Adaptec 2410SA and
      a disk-set of 8x250 SATA with an Adaptec 2810SA.

In both cases, I have a small disk aside, which I use for the OS, log-
files and such.  The array is dedicated to my data: satellite images.

Usually, having one partition is best,  certainly with a file-system
which is tuned on large disk-sets.  I choose XFS, which is capable of
handing much larger partitions.  It runs currently on SuSE9.0 with
recent 2.6 kernels.

My selection is not based on performance tests: the I/O bandwidth of
the PCI-bus is my bottleneck.  But in my case counts: as long as it
is faster than a tape-archive..... and cheap
-- 
               MarkOv

------------------------------------------------------------------------
drs Mark A.C.J. Overmeer                                MARKOV Solutions
       Mark@Overmeer.net                          solutions@overmeer.net
http://Mark.Overmeer.net                   http://solutions.overmeer.net

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-25  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-24  9:50 Huge 1.2TB partition Stas Nikiforov
2004-09-24 15:45 ` [Rocks-Discuss]Huge " Joe Landman
2004-09-24 16:04   ` David
2004-09-25  8:01 ` Mark Overmeer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040925100108.A7908@speeltuin.ATComputing.nl \
    --to=mark@overmeer.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npaci-rocks-discussion@sdsc.edu \
    --cc=stas@itam.nsc.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.