From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: __attribute__((always_inline)) fiasco
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:05:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040926020556.GR9106@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040926012925.GA14305@thundrix.ch>
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:26:18PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
>>> #define INLINE static inline // an oxymoron
>>> #define INLINE extern inline // an oxymoron
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:50:26AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> The // apart from being a C++ ism (screw C99; it's still non-idiomatic)
>> will cause spurious ignorance of the remainder of the line, which is
>> often very important. e.g.
>> static INLINE int lock_need_resched(spinlock_t *lock)
>> {
>> ...
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 03:29:25AM +0200, Tonnerre wrote:
> Mmm, shouldn't the comments be filtered *before* the definition is set
> in place? Just wondering...
I've already heard more about this than I ever cared to. I'll continue
to stick to saner subsets of C and refuse to use things such as how the
preprocessor committing incest with the compiler proper (no, I don't
need it explained to me, it's trivial) allows crappy code to be written.
Don't lecture me; there's nothing to explain and I don't want to hear it.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-26 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-23 16:26 __attribute__((always_inline)) fiasco Albert Cahalan
2004-09-23 16:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-23 16:59 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-23 17:03 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-23 17:21 ` viro
2004-09-23 17:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-23 17:39 ` viro
2004-09-26 1:29 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-26 2:05 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-30 16:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-23 16:54 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-23 17:46 ` Albert Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-23 8:47 Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040926020556.GR9106@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=tonnerre@thundrix.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.