From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Harald Milz <milz@seneca.muc.de>
Subject: Re: Spam coming from the list
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:04:46 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20040927150446.0EEC540AA8@nathan.muc.de>
References: <b01d37a4040926074578038cd8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20040926162447.718973F03@latitude.mynet.no-ip.org>
	<20040926215157.A11082@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20040927142413.60EFC40AA8@nathan.muc.de>
	<20040927143930.GA6561@redhat.com>
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> People should not have to be subscribed to a list just to report a bug.
> It's annoying as hell every time I come up with random patches, dig
> out the contact address out of MAINTAINERS, and send patches to get
> a 'you aren't subscribed yadayada' email back.

Understand. The question is which evil is the bigger one ... It's not as if
spam were less annoying ;-) 

-- 
Nothing recedes like success.
		-- Walter Winchell