From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i91B9LrT000480 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:09:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.sws.net.au (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91B8E4L001856 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:08:15 GMT From: Russell Coker Reply-To: russell@coker.com.au To: Colin Walters Subject: Re: Access to xdm_t Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:09:16 +1000 Cc: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton , Thomas Bleher , SELinux ML References: <20040929163222.GA4125@rom.cip.ifi.lmu.de> <20040930192935.GA6063@lkcl.net> <1096591648.5736.3.camel@nexus.verbum.private> In-Reply-To: <1096591648.5736.3.camel@nexus.verbum.private> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200410012109.16844.russell@coker.com.au> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:47, Colin Walters wrote: > I think the idea with doing it inside ?dm was to keep common > functionality inside the display manager; also it ensures you get an > error log even if your session script fails early on (and gdm will offer > to display the error log for example if your session lasts less than 10 > seconds, which it can really only do if it knows the name of the error > log). > > So putting it inside each session script is generally wrong I think. OK, we can have another script which just creates the error log file and launches the session script. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.