From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] add device_configure to the transport classes Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:22:33 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041006152233.GE16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <1096996724.2064.56.camel@mulgrave> <41637BBA.804@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:26507 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269286AbUJFPWi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:22:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41637BBA.804@torque.net> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Douglas Gilbert Cc: James Bottomley , Martin Peschke3 , SCSI Mailing List On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:59:38PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >Yes, that's another reason to make it transport specific. Even SPI code > >has to understand 64 bit LUN returns. > > So does James now support Martin's proposal or is there a "not" > missing in the first sentence of the above paragraph? I queried James about that yesterday; he said the "not" was missing. -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain