From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc3[+recent swsusp patches]: swsusp kernel-preemption-unfriendly?
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:46:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410062346.29489.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041006101238.GD1255@elf.ucw.cz>
On Wednesday 06 of October 2004 12:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > It looks like there's a probel with the kernel preemption vs
swsusp:
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in kernel preemption, see that NULL pointer dereference?
Try
> > > > > this one...
> > > > [-- snip --]
> > > >
> > > > Is it against -mm? It does not apply cleanly to -rc3, so I've applied
it
> > > > manually.
> > >
> > > It was against -suse... Did it help?
> >
> > I just can't say it didn't right now. The Oops was not readily
reproducible
> > anyway, so I need to do some more suspend/resume testing. I'll let you
> > know. ;-)
>
> Ahha, thats likely another problem, then. The one this fixes is 100%
> reproducible...
You are right, it doesn't help. Here's another trace for a non-preemptible
kernel with the patch applied:
Stopping tasks:
=================================================================|
Freeing
memory: .....................................................................................................................|
PM: Attempting to suspend to disk.
PM: snapshotting memory.
swsusp: critical section:
..<7>[nosave pfn
0x58c]...................................................................................................swsusp:
Nees
suspend: (pages needed: 44159 + 512 free: 86720)
..<7>[nosave pfn
0x58c].....................................................................................................swsusp:
c)
Unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000ff9f2f9f09 RIP:
<ffffffff805693f7>{syscall_init+7}
PML4 0
Oops: 0000 [1]
CPU 0
Modules linked in: usbserial parport_pc lp parport joydev sg st sd_mod sr_mod
scsi_mod usbhid snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq d
Pid: 16652, comm: hibernate.sh Not tainted 2.6.9-rc3
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff805693f7>] <ffffffff805693f7>{syscall_init+7}
RSP: 0018:0000010003301e40 EFLAGS: 00010082
RAX: 0000000000000089 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 00000000b1ff96ac RSI: 0000010003301e68 RDI: ffffffff80412190
RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff80424fc0
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 0000002a955a4000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000002a95d330a0(0000) GS:ffffffff8055eb40(0000) knlGS:0000000056055200
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000ff9f2f9f09 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process hibernate.sh (pid: 16652, threadinfo 0000010003300000, task
000001000f35c0f0)
Stack: ffffffff801209b9 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 8000894d50002080
00000000ffffffff ffffffff804dafa0 ffffffff80120c28 0000000000000000
ffffffff80161003 0000000000000000
Call Trace:<ffffffff801209b9>{fix_processor_context+137}
<ffffffff80120c28>{__restore_processor_state+120}
<ffffffff80161003>{swsusp_suspend+19}
<ffffffff8016216a>{pm_suspend_disk+90}
<ffffffff8015fd54>{enter_state+68}
<ffffffff802adb4d>{acpi_system_write_sleep+100}
<ffffffff80193854>{vfs_write+228} <ffffffff80193993>{sys_write+83}
<ffffffff80110c72>{system_call+126}
Code: ff a6 a1 80 ff 9b 9c 75 ff 97 96 74 ff a1 a0 7e ff 9e 9c 7d
RIP <ffffffff805693f7>{syscall_init+7} RSP <0000010003301e40>
CR2: 000000ff9f2f9f09
It seems that I need to run X to reproduce it and it also seems that it's more
likely to happen if I run some X apps and close them all before suspending.
Greets,
RJW
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 21:14 2.6.9-rc3[+recent swsusp patches]: swsusp kernel-preemption-unfriendly? Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-05 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 8:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-06 8:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-06 10:12 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2004-10-06 22:06 ` Fix random crashes in x86-64 swsusp Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 22:13 ` [kernel] " Andi Kleen
2004-10-06 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06 22:24 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-08 20:59 ` swsusp: 8-order memory allocations problem (was: Re: Fix random crashes in x86-64 swsusp) Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-10 13:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-10 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-14 15:37 ` swsusp: 8-order memory allocations problem (update) Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410062346.29489.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.