All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome.net>
To: Jaap-Jan Boor <jjboor@aimsys.nl>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [BUG][PPC32] Preemption patch for 2.4 Kernels
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:35:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041007183551.GA22982@gate.ebshome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3EF3884-188D-11D9-841F-000A95B15278@aimsys.nl>

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:21:54PM +0200, Jaap-Jan Boor wrote:
> 
> On 7-okt-04, at 19:34, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> >>maybe the 2.4 series is somewhat outdatet, but nevertheless used in
> >>several embedded systems and also with your preemption patches.
> >>During some investigations, we found out that the patches found on
> >>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/
> >>contain a severe bug, when using the patches on PPC systems.
> >
> >Yes, it's a known problem with rml preempt patches - DON'T USE THEM
> >on PPC. I sent him similar patch _two_ years ago - nothing happened.
> >MVL tree is IMHO better place to get preempt stuff for 2.4 - it's
> >actually tested and works.
> 
> yes, because there are more changes then only the forgotten '{'
> 

You're right, there were other (not so obvious) problems which rml 
patch (like preempt_enable_no_resched() in 
irq.c::preempt_intercept()), maybe others I don't remember now)...

--
Eugene

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-07 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-07 13:29 [BUG][PPC32] Preemption patch for 2.4 Kernels Gerhard Jaeger
2004-10-07 17:34 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-10-07 18:21   ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2004-10-07 18:35     ` Eugene Surovegin [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-07 12:51 Gerhard Jaeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041007183551.GA22982@gate.ebshome.net \
    --to=ebs@ebshome.net \
    --cc=jjboor@aimsys.nl \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.