From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add proper module ID tables to Adaptec aic7[9x]xx drivers Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:47:26 +0100 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041007214726.A17483@infradead.org> References: <41644BD5.7030807@tls.msk.ru> <20041006202543.GA22794@wotan.suse.de> <4165862E.1040904@adaptec.com> <4165950C.509@tls.msk.ru> <41659D30.7050705@adaptec.com> <20041007213612.A17286@infradead.org> <4165AA1A.1020708@adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from baythorne.infradead.org ([81.187.226.107]:40201 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268206AbUJGUrb (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:47:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4165AA1A.1020708@adaptec.com>; from luben_tuikov@adaptec.com on Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:42:02PM -0400 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Luben Tuikov Cc: Michael Tokarev , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:42:02PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote: > Ah, ok -- I was wondering. > > Well, it's not as easy as dumping the list into a table. > Let me try to come up with something here. I think best would be to kill all subvendor/subdevice id matching so we can just live with the generic ids. This would simplify things a lot if Adaptec doesn't plan to introduce random incompatiblities for devices only differing in subvendor/subdevice id.