From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267730AbUJLTRT (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:17:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267607AbUJLTPx (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:15:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:4841 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267713AbUJLTNW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:13:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:14:35 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Mathieu Segaud , sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc4-mm1 Oops [2] Message-ID: <20041012191435.GA3310@elte.hu> References: <416B9517.7010708@blueyonder.co.uk> <877jpwi8cg.fsf@barad-dur.crans.org> <200410121607.i9CG7PsQ001076@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410121607.i9CG7PsQ001076@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > I started seeing the same problem on -rc4-mm1, and couldn't figure out > why I didn't see it on -rc3-mm3. Finally figured out that it was > because the -rc3-mm3 had a -VP patch on it, and the -rc4-mm1 didn't > (because of the UP build problems in -T5). Ingo's patch also reverts > that patch, so I got the fix 'free of charge'.... > > Ingo: Was that intentional, or it just happened? was intentional - such small fixes are typical in the -VP patches since i first have to merge it and get it work on my testboxes, so if any last-minute bug slips into -mm i add the fix to VP. Ingo