From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.33) id 1CINkX-0005fA-TR for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:47:46 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CINkU-0005f4-Au for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:47:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CINkT-0005es-V1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:47:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CINkT-0005eo-HN for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:47:41 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CINck-0007un-CO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:39:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C318F5E9B22 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:39:41 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:40:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <87pt3kj56d.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> <20041015002042.GB1434@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <877jpsaiho.fsf@night.trouble.net> In-Reply-To: <877jpsaiho.fsf@night.trouble.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410151040.13611.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: NESTED_FUNC_ATTR (was: Re: iso9660 support) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:47:42 -0000 On Friday 15 October 2004 03:16, Johan Rydberg wrote: > So why not just stop using -mregparm=3? I'm pretty sure it isn't > needed in GRUB, since a boot loader doesn't have very high > performance constrains. It is necessary for the size constraint. Note that we don't need to use the same binary between the real GRUB and the emulated one. And, the emulation is only useful for debugging. So if grub-emu is difficult to maintain, I vote for just dropping it. Okuji