From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B77C2BDCF for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:52:55 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:47:31 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Pantelis Antoniou Message-ID: <20041015154731.GA3957@logos.cnet> References: <20040921103503.54102.qmail@web15607.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <4150056E.9050300@intracom.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <4150056E.9050300@intracom.gr> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Song Sam Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:41:50PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Song Sam wrote: >=20 > >Pantelis Antoniou wrote=A3=BA > > > >>Well it works OK until it gets to start init. > >> > >>Then it crashes the way it is supposed to :). > >> > >>Tom I think it's the problem we are talking about. > >> > >>Song please try this... > >> > > > >Guess what? It WORKED!!! Just one more line make it. > >Could you pls tell us the theory in it if not too > >complicated? :-) > > > >Well Done! > > > Oh man Dan will kill me :) >=20 > The theory is simple, TLB handling is faulty for 8xx. >=20 > This patch fixes it but Dan & Ben think it's just by > coincedence and we should fix it properly. Hi Pantelis, others, And what has to be done to be fixed properly?=20 Ie what is the problem in detail?