From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Developers <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: PATCH/RFC: driver model/pmcore wakeup hooks (1/4)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:41:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410182041.02192.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097906636.14156.41.camel@d845pe>
On Friday 15 October 2004 11:03 pm, Len Brown wrote:
> > - ACPI (this should probably replace the new /proc/acpi/wakeup)
>
> Agreed. That file is a temporary solution.
> The right solution is for the devices to appear in the right
> place in the device tree and to hang the wakeup capabilities
> off of them there.
So what would that patch need before ACPI could convert to use it?
I didn't notice any obvious associations between the strings in
the acpi/wakeup file and anything in sysfs. Which of USB1..USB4
was which of the three controllers shown by "lspci" (and which
one was "extra"!), as one head-scratcher.
For PCI, I'd kind of expect pci_enable_wake() to trigger the
additional ACPI-specific work to make sure the device can
actually wake that system. Seems like dev->platform_data
might need to combine with some platform-specific API hook.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-19 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-04 21:00 PATCH/RFC: driver model/pmcore wakeup hooks (1/4) David Brownell
2004-10-05 19:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-05 20:09 ` David Brownell
2004-10-05 20:15 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-05 21:53 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <200410051309.02105.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-10-16 6:03 ` Len Brown
2004-10-16 6:03 ` Len Brown
2004-10-19 3:41 ` David Brownell [this message]
[not found] ` <200410182041.02192.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2004-10-19 4:55 ` Hiroshi 2 Itoh
2004-10-19 4:55 ` [ACPI] " Hiroshi 2 Itoh
2004-10-19 5:18 ` David Brownell
2004-10-20 6:16 ` Len Brown
2004-10-20 6:16 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-19 9:11 Li, Shaohua
2004-10-19 9:11 ` Li, Shaohua
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410182041.02192.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.