From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vserver <vserver@list.linux-vserver.org>
Subject: Re: [Vserver] PROBLEM: Oops in log_do_checkpoint, using vserver
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:43:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020024342.GA9260@mail.13thfloor.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041019220100.GB12780@ns.snowman.net>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:01:00PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> > * Herbert Poetzl (herbert@13thfloor.at) wrote:
> > > have seen that too, once in a while, but there where
> > > some changes in 2.6.9, so maybe trying 2.6.9-rc4
> > > (or soon final) with vs1.9.3-rc3 (not much changed
> > > here, see delta for details) would be a good check
> >
> > Ok. I had been planning on moving to 2.6.9 and 1.9.3 as soon as both
> > were final. Guess I can try the RC releases though. :)
>
> Alright, I got the same oops w/ 2.6.9 and vs1.9.3-rc3:
>
> Assertion failure in log_do_checkpoint() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361:
> "drop_count != 0 || cleanup_ret != 0"
you can split up this assertion into
- drop_count != 0
- cleanup_ret != 0
and fail on that (or just output those values
before you panic) ... this might give some
deeper insight into the issue ...
>
> I noticed someone else had this problem too:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123137
hmm, so that kernel should not be vserver related
at all, so I'd say something with the ext3 journal
is broken ...
> I also followed up on that w/ my oops from 2.6.8.1.
>
> I also upgraded to 0.30.195, though I don't think that (or vserver in
> general, really) is related to this oops.
yeah, probably not, I think the vserver changes
just make the oops more likely (or simply the
increased load does)
> If there's anything else I can do to help get this resolved, please let
> me know.. This is the only problem I'm having with this server now,
> other than this it's behaving pretty nicely. :)
maybe until it gets fixed, mounting the ext3
without journal might help here?
best,
Herbert
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-18 3:25 PROBLEM: Oops in log_do_checkpoint, using vserver Stephen Frost
2004-10-18 11:55 ` [Vserver] " Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-18 12:20 ` Stephen Frost
2004-10-19 22:01 ` Stephen Frost
2004-10-20 2:43 ` Herbert Poetzl [this message]
2004-10-20 12:21 ` Stephen Frost
2004-10-21 9:12 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041020024342.GA9260@mail.13thfloor.at \
--to=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vserver@list.linux-vserver.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.