From: Abdul J <postabdul@yahoo.com>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: mlppp-link termination issue
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:24:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020072425.94102.qmail@web60102.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041015180546.26617.qmail@web60106.mail.yahoo.com>
Hi,
I see. I did not find any patches either. Thanks for
point out the previous post. I am copying this message
to Piet Louw as well. Piet, did you find any success
in dealing with the MLPPP primary link drop problem?
If anyone develops a patch, I would be more than happy
to rigorously test it (at user level) as I have a
dedicated multilink setup with 8 links.
Thanks,
Abdul
--- Steve Drew <steve.drew@empics.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use a similar setup of multilink PPP, I've not
> found any
> patches related to the improvements to pppd to make
> it RFC1990 compliant
> (re the first channel terminates).
> There was a post about 6 weeks ago, where someone
> (Piet Louw
> [ploubser@thepub.co.za]) was going to look into it,
> but there were no
> further posts from him.
>
> Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-ppp-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf
> Of Abdul J
> Sent: 15 October 2004 19:06
> To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: mlppp-link termination issue
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using the ppp-2.4.2 version on a Redhat machine
> with Kernel 2.4.20. I use multilink option to
> combine
> (inverse multiplex) a number of satellite links to
> aggregate bandwidth. This is a test setup and I
> control both ends of the PPP connection.
>
> I observed that when the first link drops
> (terminated/disconnected) the ppp0 interface is
> dropped even though other links of the bundle are
> still connected. This results in having to restart
> all
> the connections when the first (primary) link of the
> bundle disconnects.
>
> Though this behaviour is not in accordance with RFC
> 1990, the pppd man page (of ppp-2.4.2) acknowledges
> this.
> "Currently, if the first pppd terminates (for
> example,
> because of a hangup or a received signal) the bundle
> is destroyed"
>
> My question is: Are there any plans to fix this in
> future releases of the ppp-package or are there any
> other ppp implementations in Linux that do not
> suffer
> from this problem? Is there any way to work around
> this problem.
>
> Please share your comments
>
> Thanks
> Abdul
>
>
>
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 18:05 mlppp-link termination issue Abdul J
2004-10-20 7:24 ` Abdul J [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041020072425.94102.qmail@web60102.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=postabdul@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.