From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:41:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Message-Id: <20041020164144.3457eafe.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <3506.1098283455@redhat.com> <20041020150149.7be06d6d.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020225625.GD995@wotan.suse.de> <20041020160450.0914270b.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andi Kleen Cc: ak@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff. Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It accomplishes both of our goals. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:47:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from adsl-63-197-226-105.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([IPv6:::ffff:63.197.226.105]:55200 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:47:34 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=cheetah.davemloft.net ident=davem) by cheetah.davemloft.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKQ5R-0001p2-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:41:45 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:41:44 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Andi Kleen Cc: ak@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Message-Id: <20041020164144.3457eafe.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> References: <3506.1098283455@redhat.com> <20041020150149.7be06d6d.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020225625.GD995@wotan.suse.de> <20041020160450.0914270b.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6145 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: davem@davemloft.net Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff. Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It accomplishes both of our goals. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:41:44 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Message-ID: <20041020164144.3457eafe.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> References: <3506.1098283455@redhat.com> <20041020150149.7be06d6d.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020225625.GD995@wotan.suse.de> <20041020160450.0914270b.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20041020234144.760nZG4gSXDc-Kh7qoj_u3k2NUBkJhyWrVCCq2KlxWA@z> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff. Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It accomplishes both of our goals. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:41:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Message-Id: <20041020164144.3457eafe.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <3506.1098283455@redhat.com> <20041020150149.7be06d6d.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020225625.GD995@wotan.suse.de> <20041020160450.0914270b.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andi Kleen Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff. Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It accomplishes both of our goals.