From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Payal Rathod Subject: Re: semi OT: default route Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:57:37 -0400 Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20041020165737.GB7751@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com> References: <20041020132551.GA1720@tranquility.scriptkitchen.com> <20041020161725.GA7221@bender.817west.com> <20041020163734.GR21006@metastasis.org.uk> <20041020164830.GA7438@bender.817west.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041020164830.GA7438@bender.817west.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jason Opperisano , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:48:30PM -0400, Jason Opperisano wrote: > yes--the linux routing code will do dead gateway detection and fall > back to a lower metric route in the event of failure, and also go back > to the higher metric route upon resurrection. this can be useful for > an active-standby setup. routed might help here. Right? Can anyone with 2 ISP setup please check the load balance thing? I vaguely remember seeing something about multiple default routes in early chapters of TCP/IP Illustrated Vol. 1 (I am not at all sure). Thanks. With warm regards, -Payal --