From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270464AbUJTX5p (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:57:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270431AbUJTXzi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:55:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:52648 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270627AbUJTXxg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:53:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:16:32 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: vojtech@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usblp BKL removal Message-ID: <20041020231632.GG15716@kroah.com> References: <20041004172317.372bc9a9@lembas.zaitcev.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041004172317.372bc9a9@lembas.zaitcev.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:23:17PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Hello, Vojtech, > > the appended patch is not in yet, what gives? I sent it to Marcelo with > an understanding that it would be in Linus tree any day now. It was a couple > of months ago. It's not just BKL witchhunt either. I remember that it fixed > an oops, although I do not remember the precise scenario by now (it had > something to do with a race between ->release and ->disconnect). Applied, thanks. greg k-h