On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> Any comments would be, as always, appreciated.
> 
> -Nish
> 
> Description: Uses msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee
> the task delays as expected.
> 
applied,
didn't check the 2.4 value of that schedule_timeout(),
but old drives may still expect HZ = 100.

thanks maks