From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kip Macy Subject: Re: FreeBSD stable? was Re: Xen FreeBSD port is available? Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20041026143516.S46199@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <20041013050127.29256.qmail@web40626.mail.yahoo.com> <86wtxvlzgh.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <200410131303.47792.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> <86655esoov.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <20041014024945.F11349@demos.bsdclusters.com> <86ekk1mjam.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <20041024202024.L37780@demos.bsdclusters.com> <86d5z529zy.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <86d5z529zy.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Christian Laursen Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Keichii Moto List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org What Xen tree/changeset are you using? This was done against 1.1354 on unstable. I pulled 1.1450 and discovered that the domain builder API has changed, so I might as well take the time required to change the init path so that freebsd can be booted by the unified domain builder. -Kip On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Christian Laursen wrote: > Kip Macy writes: > > > I've had a VM up and running for about an hour and 45 minutes running > > the lmbench3 OS benchmarks. The results aren't going to be that > > interesting as I have a lot of diagnostic code in the kernel. However, > > it does serve as a first order sanity check of stability. > > Great. > > > What all do you need to do beta testing? I have a loopback image (file) > > that I use that can probably be compressed down to 100MB. The i386-xeno > > tree more or less (one needs to add a few symlinks) just drops into a > > FreeBSD 5.2.1 tree. > > Does your loopback file contain a normal userland or is it modified in > some way? If it is normal, we should be able to build one ourselves > without any problems. > > Regarding the source we will of course need whatever is not already in > the cvsuppable source. > > > How stable do you need it to be? There is a known issue that I'm working > > around by disabling pre-faulting on a 64MB range of the VA. > > At this point just stable enough to get a good feel about how it will > run. We don't have any immediate plans for production. > > > If you're inclined to work on it as well I'll send you a patch with the > > added debugging support I've added to xen. It has proven *extremely* > > useful. > > Please do. > > -- > Christian Laursen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click