From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Emoore@lsil.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
jeremy@sgi.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] MPT Fusion driver 3.02.06 update
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:08:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041026160849.GA14917@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57053AF0AE@exa-atlanta>
> This code code is ifdef'd with CPQ_CIM. We currently have this is enabled
> in the fusion Makefile. Instead would it be possible to have this disabled
> for inclusion
> in the kernel? Applications are in place now used by several customers
> using this
> interface, and it would be difficult to have this remove at this stage, as
> our
> customers are so close to shipment of product.
This code isn't acceptable for kernel inclusion at all, dito for the
hooks it needs (e.g. the sas device list)
> > please don't put this under all kinds of ifdefs, also it's
> > not working with
> > current mainline anymore anyway.
>
> I don't know what you mean. The fc_transport stuff was just added two weeks
> ago. This was added by request of Jeremy Higdon. This reports
> the port_id, port_name, and node_name. This support is enabled in
> the fusion Makefile by MPT_ENABLE_FC_TRANSPORT. Its currently disabled for
> reason (1) the transport layer is only available after 2.6.6 kernel, and
> we are supporting kernels older such as SUSE 9.1 and SLES9, (2)
> we would not be able to build driver update disks due to the dependancy
> of fc_transport.ko.
But the policy is to keep such ifdefs out of kernel drivers. If SuSE
wants current FC drivers backported they'll need to backpor the full
transport attr infrastructure.
Also as I mentioned this code doesn't compile on 2.6.10-rc at all.
> > Any reason there's no SPI transport attribute support, it's
> > rather asymetric
> > this way..
> >
>
> We are investigating into this, such as domain validation.
> What other attributes do you suggest?
if possible all that are define, see include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h
in a current kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-26 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 16:02 [ANNOUNCE] MPT Fusion driver 3.02.06 update Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-26 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-26 17:20 James.Smart
2004-10-26 17:03 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-26 17:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-26 20:29 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-10-25 23:32 Moore, Eric Dean
2004-10-26 8:09 ` Masao Fukuchi
2004-10-26 8:20 ` Douglas Gilbert
2004-10-26 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-26 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041026160849.GA14917@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Emoore@lsil.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.