From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:38:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410271438.30899.phillips@istop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417D21C8.30709@techsource.com>
On Monday 25 October 2004 11:54, Timothy Miller wrote:
> The reprogramability of the FPGA has many advantages, but
> reprogramability is not its primary purpose.
But it might turn out to be a reason for it turning into a geek trophy, if the
price is not enormously higher than closed-spec cards. You could for
example, program real-time sound effects processing into the FPGA and output
the samples through a standard sound card.
The enthusiast market is a big market these days.
> The picture I have in my head at this time expands on the idea of the
> setup engine seen in most GPU's. What I'm thinking is that the setup
> engine will be general-purpose-ish CPU with special vector and matrix
> instructions. This way, the transformation stage will occur in
> "software" executed by a specialized processor. Additionally, the
> lighting phase might be done here as well.
>
> The setup engine would produce triangle parameters which are fed to a
> rasterizer which does Gouraud shading and texture-mapping. That feeds
> pixels into something that handles antialiasing and alpha blending, etc.
I hope you're planning to have a divider available to the rasterizer for
perspective interpolation, particularly of textures.
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-25 15:54 Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?] Timothy Miller
2004-10-25 20:31 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics karl.vogel
2004-10-25 20:34 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?] Jeff Garzik
2004-10-25 22:45 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-27 18:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-10-27 19:04 ` linux-os
2004-10-29 15:48 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-29 15:46 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-26 13:09 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2004-10-26 15:27 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-26 15:26 ` linux-os
2004-10-26 16:04 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] ` <6.1.2.0.1.20041026110017.021ece28@mail.javagear.com>
2004-10-26 19:21 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] ` <200410251535.27852.rmiller@duskglow.com>
[not found] ` <417D80B0.6080007@techsource.com>
[not found] ` <200410251734.39703.rmiller@duskglow.com>
2004-10-25 23:06 ` Need help and advice... " Timothy Miller
2004-10-27 18:38 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2004-10-29 15:47 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics " Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410271438.30899.phillips@istop.com \
--to=phillips@istop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.