From: Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028063530.GA13279@percy.comedia.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41808B37.40406@monjoin.net>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:01:27AM +0200, Eric Monjoin wrote:
>Theo Van Dinter a �crit :
>
>Well it's because we have problems in this way. We have a server
>connected to 2 EMC Symmetrix where we assign some 70Gb and 40Gb Luns.
>We used Powerpath to manage the dual path to the Luns and so I first
>created mirror as this :
>But after a while I obtain that :
>Personalities : [raid1]
>read_ahead 1024 sectors
>Event: 10
>md9 : active raid1 [dev e9:31][1] [dev e8:e1][0]
> 42829184 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>and if we try to rebuild the mirror after after loosing access to one of
this might be a problem with powerpath, it seems harmless tough
>the EMC, we have really bad result :
>Personalities : [raid1]
>read_ahead 1024 sectors
>Event: 26
>md9 : active raid1 emcpowerd1[2] [dev e8:e1][0]
> 42829184 blocks [2/1] [U_]
> [>....................] recovery = 1.4% (630168/42829184)
>finish=68.1min speed=10315K/sec
this is a problem with linux md raid. it does not support fast resync
with a bitmap of changed sectors, there is a project to implement it,
but it is not yet in the standard kernel.
look on the linux-raid mailing list archives for something called 'fast
raid 1'.
i do not believe you would have any advantage in stacking md above lvm
anyway.
Regards,
Luca
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 22:02 [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 1:17 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-28 6:01 ` Eric Monjoin
2004-10-28 6:35 ` Luca Berra [this message]
2004-10-28 19:17 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-11-01 16:01 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 16:51 ` Erik Ohrnberger
2004-11-01 22:03 ` Clint Byrum
2004-11-01 22:07 ` Theo Van Dinter
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-28 18:54 ` [linux-lvm] " Michael T. Babcock
2004-10-30 16:55 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:10 ` [linux-lvm] What is the best way to configure LVM + RAID? Erik Ohrnberger
2004-10-31 17:34 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
2004-10-30 17:27 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Theo Van Dinter
2004-10-30 19:22 ` [linux-lvm] LVM DISK DIE "KieZz"
2004-10-31 16:48 ` [linux-lvm] Software raid on top of lvm logical volume Markus Baertschi
2004-11-01 6:46 ` Scott Serr
2004-11-01 15:38 ` Michael T. Babcock
2004-11-01 17:02 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041028063530.GA13279@percy.comedia.it \
--to=bluca@comedia.it \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.