Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fix e100 suspend/resume w/ 2.6.10-rc1 and above (due to pci_save_state change)

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:21:26AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:34:19 +0800 (CST)
> >From: "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@intel.com>
> >To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List 
> ><linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> >Subject: [PATCH] Fix e100 suspend/resume w/ 2.6.10-rc1 and above (due to 
> >pci_save_state change)
> >
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Recent 2.6.10-rc1 merged the pci_save_state change. This prevents some
> >drivers from working with suspend/resume. The reason is the
> >pci_save_state() called in driver's ->suspend doesn't take effect any more,
> >since pci bus ->suspend will override it. And the two states might be
> >different in some drivers, i.e. e100. I don't know if there are other
> >drivers also suffer from it.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >-yi
> >
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
> >
> >--- /tmp/e100.c	2004-10-28 16:31:41.000000000 +0800
> >+++ drivers/net/e100.c	2004-10-28 16:33:14.000000000 +0800
> >@@ -2309,9 +2309,7 @@ static int e100_suspend(struct pci_dev *
> > 
> >-	pci_save_state(pdev);
> > 	pci_enable_wake(pdev, state, nic->flags & (wol_magic | 
> > 	e100_asf(nic)));
> >-	pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > 	pci_set_power_state(pdev, state);
> 
> 
> I'm waiting for Greg to respond to the serious concerns raised by 
> BenH[1] and me[2].
> 
> AFAICS, Greg has broken the standard Linux "driver knows it, driver does 
> it" model.

Huh?  How did changing the pci_save_state() api change anything?  I
didn't change the pci core any, just made it easier to not have to
specify the storage location of the memory to save everything off on.

> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109867742404637&w=2
> [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109868495426108&w=2

I'm still on the road (all week long) and will try to get to the above
messages soon...

thanks,

greg k-h