From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: John Gilbert <jgilbert@biomail.ucsd.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.5.2
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:30:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041029203031.GB5186@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41828348.4000700@biomail.ucsd.edu>
* John Gilbert <jgilbert@biomail.ucsd.edu> wrote:
> Hello all, Ingo,
> Here's a few bugs on boot with V0.5.2, and a question: what's needed to
> get back to the verbose latency messages of previous preempt patches
> (see the terse second log)?
> (ksoftirqd/0/2/CPU#0): new 1003 us maximum-latency wakeup.
if you have LATENCY_TRACING enabled then the wakeup trace of the last
wakeup will be in /proc/latency_trace.
the reason that the messages are less verbose is that by default we are
not measuring critical sections anymore, but 'wakeup latency'. Wakeup
latency is measured from the point of wakeup to the point where the task
runs - so it makes no sense to dump the stack (which is why the previous
tracing output was more verbose) - a stackdump would always show the
scheduler codepath where we stop measuring.
you can switch back to critical section timing though, via:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_wakeup_timing
this will also turn the stackdumps back on. (those make sense in this
case because we measure 'start of critical section' to 'end of critical
section', in which case both a stackdump and the symbolic printout of
the start and end address is useful - because it's variable.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-29 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-29 16:20 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.5.2 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-10-29 16:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:52 ` John Gilbert
2004-10-29 20:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-10-29 20:41 ` Lee Revell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-28 15:02 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-10-28 18:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-27 13:53 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.3 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-27 15:26 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4 Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-27 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-27 21:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-27 23:31 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-28 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-28 8:31 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-28 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-28 9:17 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-28 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-28 13:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.5.2 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-28 14:10 ` DaMouse
2004-10-28 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041029203031.GB5186@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=jgilbert@biomail.ucsd.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.