From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is there a Comparison or Difference document between kernel 2.4 and kernel 2.6
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:09:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041031180948.GC2094@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <374639AB1012AA4C840022842AA95BC20334FCAB@ruby.patni.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 863 bytes --]
On Sun, 2004-10-31 23:35:35 +0530, Kotian, Deepak ( JBU Mumbai ) <Deepak.Kotian@patni.com>
wrote in message <374639AB1012AA4C840022842AA95BC20334FCAB@ruby.patni.com>:
> Is there a Comparison or Difference document between kernel 2.4 and kernel 2.6
> Please let me know/
Overview in short:
- Better (TM) memory management
- All important subsystems now basically work O(1)
- More (and better) USB drivers
- Very good build system
- Still some work to be done to make it well-running on my VAX
computers.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-31 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-31 18:05 Is there a Comparison or Difference document between kernel 2.4 and kernel 2.6 Kotian, Deepak ( JBU Mumbai )
2004-10-31 18:09 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-31 18:14 Kotian, Deepak ( JBU Mumbai )
2004-10-31 18:40 ` Scott T. Smith
2004-11-01 3:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-11-01 5:04 Kotian, Deepak ( JBU Mumbai )
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041031180948.GC2094@lug-owl.de \
--to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.