From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261367AbUKBMiV (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:38:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261368AbUKBMiT (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:38:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:62693 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261434AbUKBMhA (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:37:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:37:46 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove interactive credit Message-ID: <20041102123746.GB15290@elte.hu> References: <418707CD.1080903@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <418707CD.1080903@kolivas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Con Kolivas wrote: > remove interactive credit we could try this in -mm, but it obviously needs alot of testing first. Do you have any particular workload in mind where the fairness win due to this revert would/should be significant? Ingo