From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261222AbUKBMmn (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:42:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261194AbUKBMmn (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:42:43 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49565 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261534AbUKBMjq (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:39:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:40:50 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] adjust timeslice granularity Message-ID: <20041102124050.GD15290@elte.hu> References: <418707DE.70706@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <418707DE.70706@kolivas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Con Kolivas wrote: > adjust timeslice granularity this too is of the 'could potentially hurt interactivity' type and needs -mm exposure and is 2.6.11 material at the earliest. Looks good and sound otherwise. Ingo