From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261229AbUKBNUl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:20:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261329AbUKBMoU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:44:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:62443 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261219AbUKBMmi (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:42:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:42:52 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] add requeue task Message-ID: <20041102124252.GE15290@elte.hu> References: <418707E5.90705@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <418707E5.90705@kolivas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Con Kolivas wrote: > add requeue task ack for this bit, but please split this one out: | Change the granularity code to requeue tasks at their best priority | instead of changing priority while they're running. This keeps tasks | at their top interactive level during their whole timeslice. this is a behavioral change and should go into the 'possible negative effect on interactivity' bucket. (of course it could very likely have a positive effect as well - the bucket is just to separate the risks.) Ingo