From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:23:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041102152316.GX32712@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099120870.27274.37.camel@zezette>
On 2004-10-30T09:21:10, christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr> wrote:
> > What is the result of the TUR? I did not see any information about
> > it in other posts in this thread.
> >
> the tur checker in multipath-tools report ghosts as failing.
Note: This is about the kernel-internal "I'll try to read the partition
table of every block device I see, no matter what errors I get, and
NOTHING WILL STOP ME BWAHAHAHA", not about the multipath-tools. ;-)
(A behaviour which tends to mess up the logfiles quite badly.)
> > We might not normally every hit this since the scan (INQUIRY failure)
> > would likely prevent the device from showing up at all.
> scsi_id and INQUIRY succeed on ghost paths, which allow multipath to
> group them with valid paths to the same LU.
Yeah, multipath-tools et al are behaving quite correctly for these
scenarios.
> > Plus, we only call sd_spinup_disk() during discovery and not on open,
> > unlike the calls to sd_media_changed().
> Would it be workable to add a scsi_devinfo flag for devices with ghosts.
No. I think the kernel should simply notice that the TUR failed, or
abort reading the partition table on the first error. This would at
least automatically detect these cases w/o requiring explicit
blacklisting.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-02 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 23:27 [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess christophe varoqui
2004-10-26 21:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-26 21:46 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 8:42 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 18:51 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-29 14:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-29 16:48 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-27 19:02 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 19:37 ` Eddie Williams
2004-10-27 20:19 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 20:34 ` Greg Freemyer
2004-10-27 20:28 ` Philip R Auld
2004-10-27 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-28 11:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 18:14 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-28 18:21 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-30 0:41 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 1:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 7:21 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-30 8:22 ` christophe varoqui
2004-11-02 15:23 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2004-10-28 11:35 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041102152316.GX32712@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.