From: David Becker <becker@cs.duke.edu>
To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: etherbridge bottleneck
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:56:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041111145656.GV1102@cs.duke.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ae78025041111040013a4d891@mail.gmail.com>
" (1) Is Xen running on a UP, SMP or HT?
all of the above
" (2) If Xen is running on a SMP or HT, are xen0 and xenU running
" different processors or threads?
xm list doesn't break out HT contexts, so who's to say..
" (3) Which scheduler in Xen are you using? Have you changed any parameters?
factory defaults.
Here is a full account of configs and iperf speeds between domains
on an otherwise-idle host via the etherbridge, plus iperf speed over the
loopback interface for each domain.
Uni-processor (PIII)
426 Mbps xenU UNI -> xen0 UNI
267 Mbps xen0 UNI -> xenU UNI
3.34 Gbps xen0 loopback
3.14 Gbps xenU loopback
xm list
Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console
Domain-0 0 34 0 r---- 297.0
grant 2 499 0 -b--- 161.2 9602
xm info
system : Linux
host : rack099-xen
release : 2.4.27-xen0
version : #3 Wed Nov 10 11:29:37 EST 2004
machine : i686
cores : 1
hyperthreads_per_core : 1
cpu_mhz : 1396
memory : 2047
free_memory : 1485
slow Uni HT processor (P4 2.0GHz)
498 Mbps xenU HT1 -> xen0 HT0
369 Mbps xen0 HT0 -> xenU HT1
2.49 Gbps xen0 loopback
2.54 Gbps xenU loopback
xm list
Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console
Domain-0 0 34 0 r---- 561.7
globus 1 799 1 -b--- 225.5 9601
xm info
system : Linux
host : rack160-xen
release : 2.4.27-xen0
version : #2 Thu Nov 4 15:57:19 EST 2004
machine : i686
cores : 1
hyperthreads_per_core : 2
cpu_mhz : 1993
memory : 1023
free_memory : 167
faster Dual HT processors (P4 2.6GHz)
645 Mbps xenU ctxt-1 -> xen0 ctxt-0
470 Mbps xen0 ctxt-0 -> xenU ctxt-1
782 Mbps xenU ctxt-2 -> xen0 ctxt-0
563 Mbps xen0 ctxt-0 -> xenU ctxt-2
747 Mbps xenU ctxt-1 -> xenU ctxt-2
691 Mbps xenU ctxt-2 -> xenU ctxt-1
3.34 Gbps xen0 ctxt-0 loopback
3.50 Gbps xenU ctxt-1 loopback
3.41 Gbps xenU ctxt-2 loopback
xm list
Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console
Domain-0 0 34 0 r---- 1032.7
batch020 3 1999 1 -b--- 108571.9 9603
batch040 2 1799 2 r---- 154375.3 9602
xm info
system : Linux
host : rack276-xen
release : 2.4.27-xen0
version : #2 Thu Nov 4 15:57:19 EST 2004
machine : i686
cores : 2
hyperthreads_per_core : 2
cpu_mhz : 2599
memory : 3967
free_memory : 94
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-10 21:48 etherbridge bottleneck David Becker
2004-11-11 12:00 ` Bin Ren
2004-11-11 14:56 ` David Becker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-12 8:42 Ian Pratt
2004-11-14 19:53 Ian Pratt
2004-11-15 16:01 ` David Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041111145656.GV1102@cs.duke.edu \
--to=becker@cs.duke.edu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.