From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randolph Chung Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.6.10-rc1-pa11 profile data Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:51:52 -0800 Message-ID: <20041111185152.GV15714@tausq.org> References: <20041111075431.GB9768@colo.lackof.org> <20041111081154.GR15714@tausq.org> <4193AE3C.9020509@tiscali.be> Reply-To: Randolph Chung Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Joel Soete Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <4193AE3C.9020509@tiscali.be> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org > i.e. flush_kernel_[di]cache_page is few used versus > flush_kernel_[di]cache_range_asm while flush_user_[di]cache_range_asm is > more used then flush_user_[di]cache_page. > > Isn't it strange? could it be that kernel mappings tend to be bigger and user mappings tend to be smaller? i'm only guessing here... > mmm also: > 49576 machine_restart 774.6250 this is an artifact of the way the measurements are done. these are actually calls to cpu_idle(). randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux