From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAFAO7r18279 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 05:24:07 -0500 Received: from mail.o2w.nl (postfix@mail.o2w.nl [213.227.141.209]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAFAO10i001970 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 05:24:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:24:00 +0100 From: Jelle Herold Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] recover lost VG (VG data differs between PVs) Message-ID: <20041115102400.GA19918@hotwire.nl> References: <20041114225853.GB20425@hotwire.nl> <20041114232126.GH24229@agk.surrey.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041114232126.GH24229@agk.surrey.redhat.com> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development Hi Alasdair, On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:21:26PM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > VG data differs between PVs /dev/hde and /dev/hdf3 > > Volume group "datavg" doesn't exist > > So hde should be in the VG at the moment, but not hdf3? precisely. > Add a filter to lvm.conf so lvm only looks at hde. Run vgscan and see > check if things look OK eg vgcfgbackup and read the text backup file. > If things *are* OK like that, then pvremove hdf3, remove the filter & > vgscan. Wow! *phew* that did the job! THANKS A LOT!! Just a question out of curiosity, what does "VG data differs..." mean, and why does filtering hdf3 help (I thought vgreduce removed that PV from the VG)? well, again, thanks a zillion Jelle.