From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Graumann Subject: Re: patch-o-matic-ng questions and remarks from newbie Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:13:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20041115141326.4ced89bc@localhost> References: <20041107102832.463003a4@localhost> <418E8EB7.8050604@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <418E8EB7.8050604@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Thanks, I found those and have finally managed to get my kernel to compile. One general question of mine remains unsolved: is there - aside from trial and error - some way to figure out which patch in the patch-o-matic-ng plays well with what kernel? Thanks, Joh On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:08:07 +0100 Patrick McHardy wrote: > Johannes Graumann wrote: > > >I'm reposting this in the devel mailing list in the hope to find more > >of an echo than in the 'normal' one ... > > > >Hello, > > > >In order to use my shorewall/2.6 based firewall to route IPSECed > >(openswan) wireless, I need to apply these patches from the > >patch-o-matic-ng (extra): > >1) ipsec-01-output-hooks > >2) ipsec-02-input-hooks > >3) ipsec-03-policy-lookup > >4) ipsec-04-policy-checks > >5) policy > > > >It took me a whole night to figure out that these are only cleanly > >applicable to a 2.6.6 kernel and nothing later - which is ok with me > >... if I only would have managed to find this information without > >loading down 2.6.9, 2.6.8, 2.6.7 and 2.6.6 source and testing the > >patch-o-matic with every single one of these! Can somebody please > >help me dummy in finding this information? Are these patches expected > >to get a revamp to be capable to cope with 2.6.9? > > > > > Someone recently posted patches for 2.6.9 to this list, please > search the archives. > > >On another note: are/when are these features scheduled to go into the > >2.6 series? > > > Very soon hopefully. I'll post my patches for 2.6.10 for discussion > in a couple of days. > > Regards > Patrick > > >