From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
davem@davemloft.net, prasanna@in.ibm.com, suparna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kprobes: wrapper to define jprobe.entry
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:33:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041119090356.GA10082@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041118230506.4d20b3c9.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:05:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Here is a patch that adds a wrapper for defining jprobe.entry to make
> > > > it easy to handle the three dword function descriptors defined by the
> > > > PowerPC ELF ABI.
> > > >
> > > > Current patch against 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 + kprobes patch for ppc64.
> > >
> > > I don't have the kprobes-for-ppc64 patch here.
> > >
> > > > Changes for adding this wrapper for x86, ppc64 (tested) and x86_64
> > > > (untested) below. The earlier method of defining jprobe.entry will
> > > > continue to work.
> > >
> > > So what should I do with this? I'm inclined to drop it until the x86_64
> > > part has been tested and Dave has had a go at the sparc64 version.
> >
> > I have now tested the patch succesfully on x86_64 and updated it for
> > sparc64 too (Dave says the change looks good).
>
> What is the review and testing status of the kprobes-for-ppc64 patch which
> you sent?
>
The patch was earlier posted on the PPC64 mailing list for comments and
Paul had reviewed it. I had to update the patch to take care of the base
kprobe changes that were made to accomodate the x86_64 port.
The patch is tested on POWER3 (uni) and POWER4 (lpar).
Thanks,
Ananth
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-19 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 10:26 [PATCH] Kprobes: wrapper to define jprobe.entry Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-11-18 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-18 22:43 ` David S. Miller
2004-11-19 6:52 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-11-19 7:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-19 9:03 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041119090356.GA10082@in.ibm.com \
--to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.