From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: procfs proc_write_file bug Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:28:29 -0800 Message-ID: <20041119182828.GA20704@kroah.com> References: <419DFF37.5040401@kiv.zcu.cz> <20041119162612.GA19004@kroah.com> <419E23CE.2040109@kiv.zcu.cz> <20041119165603.GC19521@kroah.com> <419E398D.4070107@kiv.zcu.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:49384 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261523AbUKSS3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:29:13 -0500 To: Petr Grillinger Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <419E398D.4070107@kiv.zcu.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0100, Petr Grillinger wrote: > Ok, thanks for the info but it doesn't solve my problem. I am > limited to 2.4 kernels because I need a stable RTAI/RTNET machine. > 2.6 kernel support for these two isn't mature yet. > > But then, maybe I could port sysfs into a 2.4 kernel. Do you know > of some reason why this should be difficult? It would be easier to write your own filesystem for 2.4. Take a look at pcihpfs as an example of how to do this. good luck, greg k-h