From: Phil Dier <phil@dier.us>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Scott Holdren <scott@icglink.com>, ziggy <ziggy@icglink.com>,
Jack Massari <webmaster@icglink.com>
Subject: Re: oops with dual xeon 2.8ghz 4gb ram +smp, software raid, lvm, and xfs
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:37:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041123093744.25c09245.phil@dier.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122161725.21adb932.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:17:25 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> yow. The dread combination of XFS, LVM, software RAID and bloaty scsi
> drivers. Looks like a stack overrun.
>
> Can you rebuild the kernel with CONFIG_4KSTACKS=n?
>
Thanks for the suggestion.. I'm doing a burn-in right now with 8k
stacks, and so far, so good.
I'm building this system with stability and flexibility foremost in
mind. Am I foolish in using all of these technologies with a new-ish
version of 2.6? Is there a particular version that would be better
suited for my application? Any other suggestions you (or anyone else
on the list) could give regarding stability would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
--
Phil Dier (ICGLink.com -- 615 370-1530 x733)
/* vim:set noai nocindent ts=8 sw=8: */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 19:06 oops with dual xeon 2.8ghz 4gb ram +smp, software raid, lvm, and xfs Phil Dier
2004-11-23 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-23 15:37 ` Phil Dier [this message]
2004-11-23 17:02 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-11-23 18:29 ` Phil Dier
2004-11-23 22:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-23 22:56 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-11-23 23:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-30 17:37 ` Phil Dier
2004-11-24 15:45 ` Phil Dier
2004-11-24 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-11-24 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-25 0:48 ` Phil Dier
2004-11-28 11:29 ` David Greaves
2004-11-28 18:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 9:03 ` David Greaves
2004-12-08 9:15 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-09 3:50 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-11-24 23:12 ` Neil Brown
2004-11-24 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-25 0:14 ` Neil Brown
2004-11-25 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-25 6:57 ` Jens Axboe
2004-11-25 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-25 7:11 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-23 20:48 Joerg Sommrey
2004-11-24 9:28 Anders Saaby
[not found] <33rTj-1VZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <33wJq-633-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <34fwL-P1-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <34fGp-V2-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <34fGp-V2-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <34lVr-5WH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <34m5a-61Z-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-11-25 11:07 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041123093744.25c09245.phil@dier.us \
--to=phil@dier.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott@icglink.com \
--cc=webmaster@icglink.com \
--cc=ziggy@icglink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.